# Value at Risk (VaR) and CVaR

A loss threshold at a confidence level, and the average loss beyond it.

Source data: AMFI daily NAV (17,900+ schemes) + Nifty benchmark indices. Last updated: 2026-07-02. Interactive tool: https://mfpro.tigzig.com

## What are VaR and CVaR?



**Value at Risk (VaR)** and **Conditional VaR (CVaR)**, also called Expected
 Shortfall, are downside risk measures that quantify potential losses in the tail of the return distribution.

 


## Formula


 
 VaR (95%) = 5th percentile of daily returns
"On 95% of days, your loss won't exceed this value."

CVaR (95%) = Average of all daily returns at or below the VaR
"When things go bad (worst 5% of days), how bad on average?"
 

We use the **historical method** - the actual percentile of observed returns. No normal
 distribution assumption (parametric VaR) is made, which is important because equity returns are
 typically not normally distributed.

 


## Example



VaR and CVaR in Practice


VaR (95%) = −2.1% means: on the worst 5% of trading days, the fund lost at least 2.1%.
CVaR (95%) = −3.0% means: on those worst 5% of days, the **average** loss was 3.0%.


If a fund has 1,000 daily returns, VaR is the 50th worst return (5th percentile).
 CVaR is the average of those 50 worst returns.

 
 


## How to Interpret





- Both values are in **daily percentage** terms and are negative numbers (representing losses).

- CVaR is always worse (more negative) than VaR - it captures the average severity of tail events, not just the threshold.

- **Closer to zero = less tail risk.** A fund with VaR of −1.5% has less daily downside than one with −2.5%.

- VaR tells you the "door" to the worst 5% of days. CVaR tells you what happens once you walk through it.

- CVaR is considered a more robust risk measure than VaR because it accounts for the shape of the tail, not just one point.


 


## Important Notes





- Historical VaR depends entirely on the sample period - it cannot predict unprecedented events.

- A fund with few extreme losses will show VaR and CVaR close together. Large gaps between them indicate a long, fat tail.

- Minimum 60 daily observations required for meaningful percentile calculation.

- These are daily measures. To approximate monthly VaR, multiply by √21 (not exact, but directional).

## Related metrics

More Advanced Risk methodology from the MFPRO analytics tool:

- [Treynor Ratio](/mfpro/treynor-ratio)

- [Skewness and Kurtosis](/mfpro/skewness-and-kurtosis)

- [Ulcer Index](/mfpro/ulcer-index)

- [Drawdown and Recovery](/mfpro/drawdown-recovery)

- [Correlation Matrix](/mfpro/correlation-matrix)

---
Source: https://www.tigzig.com/mfpro/value-at-risk-cvar